The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger
Free Initial Consultation 888.863.6427
813.501.2688
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Our Firm
  • Criminal Defense
  • DUI Defense
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
  • Case Results
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Blog 2011 October Constitutionality of Florida's Drug Law
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Constitutionality of Florida's Drug Law

Posted By The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger || 7-Oct-2011

Constitutionality of Florida's Drug Statute

On July 27th, 2011, United States District Judge Mary S. Scriven entered an order in Shelton v. Florida Department of Corrections finding that Florida Statutes section 893.13 is unconstitutional on its face in that it does not require the State to prove a "knowledge" or "mens rea" element. More specifically, while section 893.13 makes it unlawful for a person to knowingly possess, sell, or deliver a controlled substance, the statute, as written, does not require the state to prove that the accused knew of the illicit nature of the substance. Any ambiguity was resolved in 2002 when the Florida legislature enacted section 893.101, which expressly states that the state is not required to prove the defendant knew of the illicit or unlawful nature of the controlled substance found in his or her actual or constructive possession. Judge Scriven noted in her forty three page order that Florida is the only state is the nation to expressly eliminate mens rea as an element of a drug offense.

On August 17th, 2011, Judge Milton Hirsch in Miami, granted the motions of thirty nine defendants to dismiss their charges under 893.13 based on the ruling in Shelton. In granting the motions, Judge Hirsch echoed Judge Scriven's finding that section 893.13 is facially violative of the Due Process clause of the 14th amendment. In Pinellas and Hillsborough Counties, motions to dismiss based on the purported unconstitutionality of 893.13 have been denied. The Florida Supreme Court will resolve this issue in the coming months.

If you are charged with a violation of Florida Statute section 893 contact The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger, Tampa criminal defense attorneys, to defend your drug charge.

Share Post

Recent Posts

  • Attorney Timothy Hessinger Receives Superb Martindale-Hubbell® AV® Rating
  • Kidnapping Your Own Child?
  • Unlawful Police Stops - Know Your Rights
  • Hit & Run Laws in Florida
  • The Requirements to Qualify for Expungement in Florida
  • What is the Ignition Interlock?
  • The Differences Between a Misdemeanor and a Felony
  • Marijuana becoming big business in U.S..

Archives

  • 2016 (1)
    • January (1)
  • 2015 (1)
    • July (1)
  • 2014 (8)
    • December (2)
    • April (6)
  • 2013 (15)
    • October (2)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • June (1)
    • May (5)
    • April (2)
    • March (3)
  • 2012 (8)
    • November (1)
    • September (2)
    • August (3)
    • April (2)
  • 2011 (2)
    • October (1)
    • September (1)

Most Popular

  • The Requirements to Qualify for Expungement in Florida
  • The Difference Between a Civil Traffic Infraction and a Criminal Traffic Offense
  • "Irrational" Woman Arrested After Tampa Airport Assault
  • Unlawful Police Stops - Know Your Rights
  • Kidnapping Your Own Child?

Contact a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Today!

Get In Touch

Attorney Profile

How Can We Help You?

  • Timothy G. Hessinger
  • Former State Prosecutor
  • Home
  • Case Results
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger

Toll-Free (888) 863-6427

The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger -Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer
540 4th Street North, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 View Map
Toll-Free (888) 863-6427
Local (813) 501-2688
Website: https://www.tampaflcriminaldefenselawyers.com
© 2021 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.