The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger
Free Initial Consultation 888.863.6427
813.501.2688
  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Our Firm
  • Criminal Defense
  • DUI Defense
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • Contact Us
  • Case Results
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Blog 2012 August To blow or not to blow? Part 2
Previous Post  |  Next Post

To blow or not to blow? Part 2

Posted By The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger || 29-Aug-2012

If you do get stopped for suspicion of DUI should you do the Field Sobriety Tests (FST's) and take a breath test? The answer to this question is complicated. If you are not impaired, but you did have some alcohol to drink, you should probably perform the Field Sobriety Tests if requested by law enforcement. Always be calm and be respectful to the officer even if they are not respectful towards you. Remember that the Field Sobriety Tests are "divided attention tests." This means the police are testing your ability to listen to complicated instructions while maintaining a test starting position. If you step out of the starting position while the officer if giving instructions, or if you start the test before you are asked to start - you have already failed the test. So, listen carefully and follow instructions. Ask the officer to repeat the instruction or clarify anything you are unsure of.

If you refuse to take the FST's you will probably be arrested. However, if you take the FST's you will probably be arrested anyway. I have seen many FST videos where the client looks great doing the FST's on video, but nevertheless, they were arrested and requested to take a breath test. You take the FST because you did not have much to drink (one two or three drinks over a couple of hours) and you are not impaired. It's very difficult for a prosecutor to get a DUI conviction if the defendant looks good on the FST video. It's important that if you have any infirmities you tell the officer. If you have a bad knee, tell the officer about your knee surgery and that if affects your gate and balance but that you will do your best.

If you believe you are impaired then invoke your right to remain silent and refuse all FST's.

Part three to come.

Share Post

Recent Posts

  • Attorney Timothy Hessinger Receives Superb Martindale-Hubbell® AV® Rating
  • Kidnapping Your Own Child?
  • Unlawful Police Stops - Know Your Rights
  • Hit & Run Laws in Florida
  • The Requirements to Qualify for Expungement in Florida
  • What is the Ignition Interlock?
  • The Differences Between a Misdemeanor and a Felony
  • Marijuana becoming big business in U.S..

Archives

  • 2016 (1)
    • January (1)
  • 2015 (1)
    • July (1)
  • 2014 (8)
    • December (2)
    • April (6)
  • 2013 (15)
    • October (2)
    • September (1)
    • August (1)
    • June (1)
    • May (5)
    • April (2)
    • March (3)
  • 2012 (8)
    • November (1)
    • September (2)
    • August (3)
    • April (2)
  • 2011 (2)
    • October (1)
    • September (1)

Most Popular

  • The Requirements to Qualify for Expungement in Florida
  • The Difference Between a Civil Traffic Infraction and a Criminal Traffic Offense
  • 6 Florida Deaths Linked to Fake Ecstasy
  • Unlawful Police Stops - Know Your Rights
  • Two Suspects Arrested After Fatal Tampa Home Invasion

Contact a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Today!

Get In Touch

Attorney Profile

How Can We Help You?

  • Timothy G. Hessinger
  • Former State Prosecutor
  • Home
  • Case Results
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger

Toll-Free (888) 863-6427

The Law Office of Timothy Hessinger -Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer
540 4th Street North, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 View Map
Toll-Free (888) 863-6427
Local (813) 501-2688
Website: https://www.tampaflcriminaldefenselawyers.com
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.